Entry tags:
The Evil Genius
Last night I watched the third episode of the BBC's Sherlock with my parents, and I started thinking about the arch-nemesis or "evil genius."
In contemporary DC Comics, Batman's evil genius is the Joker. Many writers portray their relationship as much more complex than the "good vs. evil." Instead, Batman and the Joker depend on each other for purpose. They have become so entwined that neither seems to be able to exist without the other. Batman has become almost incapable of killing the Joker, or letting him die by inaction, because somehow Batman has come to need the Joker. It's more than two side of the same coin, it's a yin-yang. Batman has just enough of the Joker's madness, and the Joker has just enough sanity, for them to understand each other in a way no one else can.
In The Three Musketeers, D'Artagnan has an evil genius. No, it isn't Richelieu, although the Cardinal is definitely a genius and arguable evil. The man that D'Artagnan designates as his evil genius is Richelieu's right hand, Rochefort, whom he encounters on the road to Paris and challenges to a duel. Rochefort leaves him, stealing the letter from D'Artagnan's father to Treville, the leader of the Musketeers. Throughout the story, D'Artagnan has glimpses or brief encounters with Rochefort, but is time and again prevented from enacting the duel he craves. At last, in an uneasy truce with the Cardinal, Rochefort and D'Artagnan become fierce rivals and, eventually, friends. At first, they are too alike to be friends, too equally matched, and too loyal to their respective guards. Over time, after each has won several duels, their rivalry grows to encompass friendship.
I mention D'Artagnan and Rochefort, because their relationship seems to me to be a step in the evolution of this Evil Genius/Arch-Nemesis/Other Half type. We could go back further, push the idea a bit, and wind up looking at Gilgamesh and Enkidu. My mentor called their part of the epic "the original buddy movie." Enkidu is created to provide Gilgamesh with an equal, so that Gilgamesh will stop raising hell at home. Before they become friends, they fight. Now you know where "Lethal Weapon" got it from. It is Enkidu's death that sends Gilgamesh, grief-stricken and afraid, on his quest for immortality.
I am getting distracted from the Evil Genius, though. Does King Arthur have an Evil Genius? If he does, is it Mordred or Lancelot? Someone else altogether? Robin Hood doesn't, really. The Sheriff of Nottingham is not really clever enough to count as Robin's equal. Though Robin Hood follows the Gilgamesh-Enkidu paradigm with many of his companions, notably Little John, Friar Tuck, and Will Scarlet.
In the BBC Sherlock, the relationship between Moriarty and Holmes seems on track for a Batman-Joker dynamic, but in the original Doyle stories, Holmes only had a few glimpses of Moriarty and they never confronted each other directly.
I just flashed on another similar pair, or even trio, if you prefer: Gollum/Smeagol and Frodo. Frodo is determined to help Gollum because he needs to believe there is hope for himself. It becomes nearly an obsession, blinding him to Gollum's treachery and alienating Sam. But it is the push and pull between Gollum and Frodo that finally brings the ring's destruction.
It is not easy to create relationships as complex as some of these are. I find it immensely gratifying, though. The simple dichotomy of good & evil, white hats vs. black hats, to my mind is not only unrealistic but boring. Life, the universe, people are so complex, and our relationships and our choices are all part of it. Who our enemies are and why can reveal as much or more about a character as who our friends are.
This was kind of a pointless rambling, but oh well. No one reads this blog anyway.
In contemporary DC Comics, Batman's evil genius is the Joker. Many writers portray their relationship as much more complex than the "good vs. evil." Instead, Batman and the Joker depend on each other for purpose. They have become so entwined that neither seems to be able to exist without the other. Batman has become almost incapable of killing the Joker, or letting him die by inaction, because somehow Batman has come to need the Joker. It's more than two side of the same coin, it's a yin-yang. Batman has just enough of the Joker's madness, and the Joker has just enough sanity, for them to understand each other in a way no one else can.
In The Three Musketeers, D'Artagnan has an evil genius. No, it isn't Richelieu, although the Cardinal is definitely a genius and arguable evil. The man that D'Artagnan designates as his evil genius is Richelieu's right hand, Rochefort, whom he encounters on the road to Paris and challenges to a duel. Rochefort leaves him, stealing the letter from D'Artagnan's father to Treville, the leader of the Musketeers. Throughout the story, D'Artagnan has glimpses or brief encounters with Rochefort, but is time and again prevented from enacting the duel he craves. At last, in an uneasy truce with the Cardinal, Rochefort and D'Artagnan become fierce rivals and, eventually, friends. At first, they are too alike to be friends, too equally matched, and too loyal to their respective guards. Over time, after each has won several duels, their rivalry grows to encompass friendship.
I mention D'Artagnan and Rochefort, because their relationship seems to me to be a step in the evolution of this Evil Genius/Arch-Nemesis/Other Half type. We could go back further, push the idea a bit, and wind up looking at Gilgamesh and Enkidu. My mentor called their part of the epic "the original buddy movie." Enkidu is created to provide Gilgamesh with an equal, so that Gilgamesh will stop raising hell at home. Before they become friends, they fight. Now you know where "Lethal Weapon" got it from. It is Enkidu's death that sends Gilgamesh, grief-stricken and afraid, on his quest for immortality.
I am getting distracted from the Evil Genius, though. Does King Arthur have an Evil Genius? If he does, is it Mordred or Lancelot? Someone else altogether? Robin Hood doesn't, really. The Sheriff of Nottingham is not really clever enough to count as Robin's equal. Though Robin Hood follows the Gilgamesh-Enkidu paradigm with many of his companions, notably Little John, Friar Tuck, and Will Scarlet.
In the BBC Sherlock, the relationship between Moriarty and Holmes seems on track for a Batman-Joker dynamic, but in the original Doyle stories, Holmes only had a few glimpses of Moriarty and they never confronted each other directly.
I just flashed on another similar pair, or even trio, if you prefer: Gollum/Smeagol and Frodo. Frodo is determined to help Gollum because he needs to believe there is hope for himself. It becomes nearly an obsession, blinding him to Gollum's treachery and alienating Sam. But it is the push and pull between Gollum and Frodo that finally brings the ring's destruction.
It is not easy to create relationships as complex as some of these are. I find it immensely gratifying, though. The simple dichotomy of good & evil, white hats vs. black hats, to my mind is not only unrealistic but boring. Life, the universe, people are so complex, and our relationships and our choices are all part of it. Who our enemies are and why can reveal as much or more about a character as who our friends are.
This was kind of a pointless rambling, but oh well. No one reads this blog anyway.